so am wondering how to get the patch code and 3 of 9 bar code printed and detected. I used the same procedure for QR codes and it was being detected succesfully. Set the bar code type as 3 of 9 and search direction as Horizontal, Vertical, Reverse Horiz and Reverse Vertical and Quality as Poor.Īlso, all the other options like Edge Enhancement, enhancement, Removal and FormsId have been disabled. Just FYI, for Patch Code Detection in Doc Processing Component, I have enabled it and set the left offset to 2.00įor Bar Code Detection in Doc Processing Component, I have enabled Detection, verify checksum, beep and ratio 2:1. However, I have a sheet on which there was a pre-pprinted bar code (3 of 9), and when i scan this sheet, the bar code is read successfully. In both the cases, the patch code and the bar code are not being read. For 3of 9, I used online 3 of 9 bar code generators to create the bar code and stuck the image on a piece of paper and took a print out. I used Kodak's standard patch code (Path 1 to 6) and modified it to form a horizontal patch and stuck it on a piece of paper though MSPaint and took a print out. However, i think its the manner in which the patch code or bar code is being generated and printed on paper which is causing it not to be recognized. I have enabled the patch code and bar code detetction in the configuration. Although, its fairly staightforward, I'm having difficulty in getting the patch code or bar code to be printed on a sheet of paper and getting recognized by Capture Doc processing component. )" would go away in this case, and the whole format would look more like a table.Hi, we are planning to implement a batch and document separator via patch code or 3 of 9 bar code separator sheets in FileNet Capture Professional 5.2 through Kofax Adrenaline Image Proccessing Engine (AIPE 4.10). Enable JavaScript in your browser for this website to work properly For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Where the column text is the property name (unless disabled), and the list of values possibly with another custom separator in between. Or should the display just be of the form: I think this latter kind of separator is closer to the parameter you suggest. Unfortunately, both separators are unified in the current code, but they are logically not the same. Now for lists, there is a second type of "," separator: the one that is used between the results generated by each printout. Unfortunately, this would need to be taken into account individually in all printouts since it is hard to unify the code. Part of what you suggest has been planned for some time now: ?printouts can now have parameters like "limit" and one could have a parameter "sep" for printouts to define how they separate their items. The name of the parameter should really be changed now that this type is available in SMW. I first thought that this request is about Type:Record, but it actually is about multiple items in a list.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |